numbersbetting.com numbersbetting.com Skip to content
P700
Prices modelled
8
3.00 to 34.00
Fractions
2
Quarter and fifth
Break-even 3.00
71%
Place chance, 1/5
Break-even 21.00
20%
Place chance, 1/5

Each Way Betting Explained: What the Place Terms Are Actually Worth

An each-way bet is two bets, and the second one is priced by a rule rather than by a market. That makes it unusually easy to check — and it shows quickly that the place half is worth very different amounts at different odds.

What this page is. Arithmetic on published place terms, not a measurement of any bookmaker. Our margin study covers match-result markets and does not include horse racing, so nothing here is presented as a measured figure.

The two halves of an each-way bet

A £10 each-way bet costs £20. Ten pounds backs the selection to win at the odds shown; ten pounds backs it to finish inside the places, settled at a fraction of those odds. The fraction and the number of places are set by the bookmaker’s terms for that event, not by the market, which is why they are worth reading before the price is.

The win half needs no explanation — it is an ordinary bet at the ordinary price. The place half is where the value moves, because a fixed fraction applied to a small number produces a very small number.

Where the place part stops making sense

For each win price, the chance of placing that the place half needs simply to break even. Above that line the place bet is worth its cost; below it, it is not.

Place returns and break-even place chances at 1/4 and 1/5 terms, by win odds
Win odds Place return at 1/4 Break-even place chance Place return at 1/5 Break-even place chance
3.00 1.50 66.7% 1.40 71.4%
5.00 2.00 50.0% 1.80 55.6%
7.00 2.50 40.0% 2.20 45.5%
9.00 3.00 33.3% 2.60 38.5%
11.00 3.50 28.6% 3.00 33.3%
15.00 4.50 22.2% 3.80 26.3%
21.00 6.00 16.7% 5.00 20.0%
34.00 9.25 10.8% 7.60 13.2%

Read the short-priced rows first. At 3.00 with fifth-odds terms, the place half returns 1.40 and therefore needs a 71% chance of placing just to cover its own cost. At 21.00 the same fraction returns 5.00 and needs only 20%. The bet type has not changed; the arithmetic underneath it has.

This is the whole of the each-way question, and it explains a rule of thumb that circulates without its reasoning: each-way tends to suit longer prices. The reason is not folklore, it is that a fifth of a large number is useful and a fifth of a small one is not.

Each way bet calculator

Set the price, the place fraction and your stake. It returns what each half costs, what each half pays, and the chance of placing the place half needs to be worth its cost.

Total outlay
Returns if it wins
Returns if it places only
Place part pays at
Break-even place chance
The chance of placing at which the place half of the bet exactly covers its own cost. It is arithmetic on the terms, not an estimate of any runner’s chance.

What the place fraction cannot tell you

Everything above is arithmetic on published terms, which makes it checkable and also makes it narrow. The break-even line says what the place half needs to be worth its cost; it says nothing about whether a given selection clears that line, and it cannot, because that is a judgement about the race rather than a property of the terms.

Two variables move the answer more than the fraction does. The number of places is set per event and shifts with field size — the same 1/5 terms over four places rather than three add an outcome that pays without changing the price, and an extra-places offer does the same thing again. The field itself decides how plausible the required place chance is: a break-even requirement that is demanding in a fourteen-runner handicap can be unremarkable in a six-runner conditions race. Neither is in the table above, because neither is published as a rule.

It is also worth being explicit about the boundary with the rest of this site. Our margin study covers match-result markets across five competitions and contains no horse racing at all, so no figure here is a measurement of any operator. When an operator page quotes a margin, that figure came from a stored capture; when this page quotes a place return, it came from applying a published fraction to a price. Those are different kinds of number and mixing them would make both less useful.

Questions about each way betting

How does an each-way bet work?

It is two equal bets in one. Half the stake goes on the win, half on the place. A £10 each-way bet costs £20: £10 to win at the full odds, £10 to place at a fraction of them, usually a quarter or a fifth, over a set number of places.

What does 1/5 odds 3 places mean?

The place part is settled at one fifth of the win odds and pays if your selection finishes in the first three. On a 20/1 shot, the place part returns at 4/1 if it finishes first, second or third.

Is each-way betting good value?

It depends almost entirely on the odds and the place terms, not on the horse. At short prices the place fraction is small in absolute terms, so the place half of the bet needs an implausibly high chance of placing to be worth its cost. At longer prices the same fraction is worth far more.

Why is each-way bad on short-priced favourites?

Because the place return is a fraction of an already small number. At 3.00 with 1/5 odds, the place part returns just 1.40 — it needs a roughly 71% chance of placing merely to break even, which is a demanding requirement even for a strong favourite.

Are extra places offers worth taking?

They change the arithmetic in the customer’s favour, sometimes substantially, because they add outcomes that pay without changing the price. Whether any particular offer is worth acting on depends on the field and the terms, which is outside what this site measures.

Does each-way apply outside horse racing?

Yes, most visibly in golf, where large fields mean place terms often run to five, six or more places. The arithmetic is identical; only the number of places and the fraction change.

Do the figures on this page come from your study?

No. This page is arithmetic on published place terms, not a measurement of any operator. Our margin study covers match-result markets and does not include horse racing at all, which is stated on the method page.